Hey hey, game developers!

A lot happening this week, and most of it circles back to the same fundamental question: where does the money come from, and what strings does it bring along. But there was at least one story worth genuine optimism, so let's start there.

A $100M fund without recoup clauses

Griffin Gaming Partners announced a new $100 million fund aimed exclusively at independent developers. The model is revenue-based financing: the fund takes a share of what the game earns, without taking equity in the company and without the predatory recoup terms that show up in most traditional publisher contracts.

The fund has already invested in 15 titles, including Darkwood 2 and Menace, and the person running it is Tim Bender, CEO of Hooded Horse, who has previously gone on record calling recoup clauses "fundamentally stupid" and one of the worst things that exists in publisher-developer contracts. The fact that it's him managing this portfolio is not a coincidence.

For developers trying to understand their financing options, this is worth paying attention to. Revenue-based financing is not automatically cheaper than a publisher advance, but it tends to respect creative autonomy in ways that most publisher contracts don't. The details matter, and I'm still waiting to see the full terms Griffin will actually offer, but the direction is encouraging.

Nintendo raises Switch 2 prices

Nintendo confirmed price hikes for the Switch 2 across multiple markets, including the US, Canada, Japan, and Europe. The company cited US trade tariffs on Asian imports as the main driver, and already factored in a hardware sales decline for fiscal year 2027.

The move itself isn't a shock, but what it illustrates is that console hardware supply chains are far more exposed to international politics than most people think about day-to-day. For developers, the practical impact plays out over the medium term: more expensive hardware means a slower-growing install base, and a smaller install base is a smaller addressable market for anyone launching on those platforms. That doesn't shift in weeks, but it belongs in the thinking of anyone deciding where to focus their platform efforts over the next couple of years.

On the other side: Nintendo's last fiscal year was excellent, with revenue nearly doubling on the back of the Switch 2 launch. The hardware connected with audiences, and the price increase reflects external pressures, not weak demand.

The Triple-i Initiative's argument for not-for-profit

The Triple-i Initiative, the indie showcase run by Evil Empire (the studio behind Rogue Prince of Persia), held its 2026 edition during Gamescom Latam, and the numbers were solid: over 3 million wishlists in total, with a median of 60,000 wishlists per game.

What interests me more than the raw numbers is the model. Evil Empire charges participating studios around €14,000, which covers the event's operating costs and nothing beyond that. No profit for the organizer. COO Benjamin Laulan was straightforward: they're not chasing indiscriminate growth, they turn down studios whose games don't fit the audience, and that curatorial discipline is exactly what creates the value developers are paying to access.

For comparison, according to a leaked report that was never officially confirmed, The Game Awards charges between $450,000 and $1 million per appearance. These aren't comparable events, but the question Laulan raised is one worth sitting with: at what cost, and for which audience? His advice to developers: don't look only at a showcase's total viewership. Look at games similar to yours that appeared there before, and trace how they actually performed.

Generic visibility and qualified visibility are very different things, and the Triple-i is betting it knows which one actually moves the needle.

Sony and the weight of the Bungie acquisition

Sony reported Q4 and full fiscal year results, and the number that dominated coverage was a $765 million impairment charge related to the Bungie acquisition. Operating income for the Games and Network Services segment fell 41.6% in the quarter, even as the full fiscal year grew 12%.

I'll stay out of the specifics of the Bungie situation, but the case is a concrete illustration of what happens when an acquisition doesn't deliver on its expected value and the buyer has to formally recognize that in the balance sheet. A $765 million impairment means Sony has revised downward the future earnings it expects Bungie to generate, and that is a significant correction by any measure.

For anyone following M&A activity in the industry, this kind of writedown is worth understanding: it signals not just that something went wrong operationally, but that the strategic thesis behind the acquisition needs revisiting.

Unity launches AI tools suite

Unity announced a new suite of AI tools called Unity AI Beta, including a smart helper designed to support developers using the platform's tooling more effectively. The assistant responds to natural language queries, helping with tasks like navigating project structure, debugging, and build configuration.

This follows GameMaker's announcement last week of Claude Code integration into its CLI. Both moves point at the same direction: AI assistance is entering the actual development workflow, not as a speculative future feature, but as a live option in the tools many developers already use. The technical barrier to getting something running is going down. The barrier to making something worth playing is not, and that distinction is going to matter more as these tools become ubiquitous.

Indie studios funding other indie studios

Game Developer ran a feature this week on indie studios that have started investing in other indie studios, sometimes taking publisher roles, sometimes providing funding without strings. The PlateUp developer joining forces with Yogscast Games was one example: a studio that had a successful game turning around and trying to give others the kind of support they wished they had.

There's something real in this pattern. When developers with actual experience of making indie games independently control the capital, the terms tend to look different. Not always better, context matters, but different in ways that usually reflect a more honest understanding of what development actually looks like from the inside.

Another week, a lot to think about. If something in here landed differently based on your own experience as a developer, or if you're watching something in the industry that hasn't made it into the weekly feeds yet, drop it in the comments. That kind of exchange is what makes this worth writing. And if the issue was worth your time, sharing it with someone who might find it useful goes a long way.

Take care and see you next Saturday, and if you want to follow along on industriadejogos.com.br as well, the door is open.

Brazilian Game Development Articles